urbottawa
Active Member
Discussion History:
https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=211305&page=6
https://skyscraperpage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=211305&page=6
|
|
|
Ottawa/Gatineau Infill Projects
- Thread starter urbottawa
- Start date
urbottawa
Active Member
Row houses at Parent Ave. and Guigues Ave.
Looks decent. No one will miss what was there before:
www.google.com
Google Maps
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
www.google.com
Lowertown has somehow been missing out on the gentrification trend, but a few more of these and it might catch on. Surprised there aren't bars on the windows for now thoughLooks decent. No one will miss what was there before:
Google Maps
Find local businesses, view maps and get driving directions in Google Maps.
Ottawacurious
New Member
330 McLeod / 233 Argyle is getting a 4 story addition at the back.
Devapps Link
Address/Google Maps
Brief Description of project: The development proposes to maintain the existing, 48-unit rooming house and construct a four-and-a-half storey rear addition.
Devapps Link
Address/Google Maps
Brief Description of project: The development proposes to maintain the existing, 48-unit rooming house and construct a four-and-a-half storey rear addition.
Last edited:
urbottawa
Active Member
Really nice build on O’Connor near Lansdowne. Thought it might be multi-unit at first but it’s just a SFH. Could be yours for only 3.1m!
Replacing old stock housing for a sfh should not be allowed.
Dzingle Bells
Active Member
My most recent spicy Ottawa city building take is that no new SFHs should be allowed to be built within the Greenbelt. 
This one I just passed on Hilson is really cool
To each their own. I think that is horrendous!
Westbro
Active Member
I disagree heavily with your spicy take. If the land is properly up-zoned and someone with deep pockets wants to pay an arm and a leg to basically outcompete the market for multi-family, so be it. We need MORE flexibility in our zoning not less. I like the concept of minimum densities in new subdivisions because they are a different beast entirely. But you can even see in any established neighbourhood it is rare for a property which is allowed higher density by right to end up with a SFH.My most recent spicy Ottawa city building take is that no new SFHs should be allowed to be built within the Greenbelt.
All your approach would do is sky-rocket the value of recently built/renovated SFHs if there is essentially a moratorium on them. This would further exacerbate building issues since people would be willing to buy the absolute trash old house and renovate instead of waiting for a developer to buy the lot, and rebuild or sever with 2 semis etc.
Right now it doesn't work that way because the zoning makes SFH artificially cheap (by putting a cap on the land-value and massively oversupplying) and multi-family artificially expensive (by limiting land supply by zoning and doing the opposite).
It hurts my soul to see nice/solid brick houses from the 60s and earlier demolished for giant, horrible looking stucco McMansions. At least when it's a multi-family, it adds housing.
Ottawacurious
New Member
Same. I was pondering what that would look like in reality.
Ottawacurious
New Member
New wateridge coming up....more charc whites. <yay>
Dev Apps for
Some SSP chatter specific to this part of the development
Addresses also included in the development are 1000 and 1050 Tawdina Street.
Dev Apps for
Some SSP chatter specific to this part of the development
- 375 CODD'S
- 1345 HEMLOCK
- "Building 3" There are 3 buildings and one corner park. Building '3' is shown below
"Building 3":
Addresses also included in the development are 1000 and 1050 Tawdina Street.
Last edited:
I don't get it. What do developers have against colour? Or even classic red brick?