News   Feb 05, 2024
 1K     0 
News   Jan 27, 2020
 1.9K     0 
News   Nov 14, 2019
 2K     0 

Stittsville | 6310 Hazeldean Rd | 29+77m | 9+25s | Devmont | Figurr

rocketphish

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 19, 2023
Messages
31
Reaction score
18
Location
Planet Ottawa and beyond
Devmont has redesigned their proposed development at 6310 Hazeldean Road in Stittsville to accommodate two (2) multi-storey residential buildings, featuring a total of 431 apartment units. A range of unit profiles are proposed, including one-bedroom, one-bedroom-plus-den, two-bedroom, two-bedroom-plus-den, and three-bedroom units.

The western building is ‘L’-shaped, which incorporates a gradual transition from three (3) storeys at the southwest to six (6) storeys in the northwest, with nine (9) storeys in the north-central portion of the development. The eastern residential building features a rectangular podium-and-tower format that transitions from a three (3) storey section in the southeast to a seven (7) storey middle section, culminating in a twenty-five (25) storey tower section in the northeast portion of the subject property along Hazeldean Road.

Architect: Figurr Architecture


Development application:


Location:

N9IncAF.png


l0Zzebh.png



Siteplan:

EmUgMbB.png



Renderings:

FPX6SGK.png


imceViY.png


MiSS6Hl.png


WDLzHVB.png


Ai2ERRd.png


RWJiamx.png


YMAhNs3.png


7MGGHZG.png


K5IkT33.png
 
Montreal firm’s two-building proposal for Stittsville includes 25-storey residential highrise

David Sali, OBJ
January 17, 2024 4:06 PM ET


A Montreal-based developer wants to build a new multi-residential project in Stittsville that would include more than 400 apartments but fewer parking spaces than current zoning rules mandate.

Devmont’s proposal for 6310 Hazeldean Rd. would be anchored by a building on the east end of the site with components of various heights culminating in a 25-storey highrise on the northeast portion of the property. The other sections would be three and seven storeys.

An L-shaped building on the west side of the property would transition from three storeys in the southwest corner to six storeys in the northwest, with a nine-storey section in the middle.

The proposed development would include a total of 431 rental apartment units ranging from one- to three-bedroom suites. A total of 389 parking spaces would be provided for residents along with 86 spots for visitors, split between underground and surface lots.

Current zoning bylaws limit buildings to a maximum of 15 metres, or five storeys, on the site. The developer is asking for an amendment to allow for greater heights as well as fewer residential parking spots than the 517 that are required under current zoning rules.

In a document prepared by planning consultant Fotenn, Devmont argues that since some tenants are likely to be remote workers as well as recent post-secondary graduates, “modest-income residents” and seniors who might not own cars, the amount of parking provided in the current proposal should suffice.

“Regardless of personal vehicle ownership status, all residents in the development will benefit from the ability to meet daily needs within walking distance of the subject property, particularly groceries, fitness facilities, and other services,” the application says.

“Additionally, rates of private vehicle ownership are generally anticipated to fall over time for many demographic profiles, due to affordability considerations, personal preferences, and improved transit services.”

The plan is a revised version of an earlier development application Devmont submitted in April 2022.

That proposal called for three nine-storey buildings with a total of 317 residential units. One building was slated only for residential use, while the other two would have been mixed-use buildings with nearly 23,000 square feet of ground-floor commercial space, with residential units above.

However, the city’s urban design review panel recommended a series of changes to the proposal, including that two of the buildings be merged and that amenity space for residents be improved. The panel also questioned the viability of the retail component.

Under the new design, the buildings have been re-aligned so that the highest densities are concentrated on the northeast portion of the property facing Hazeldean Road. The developer says the revamped plan offers more “visual interest” and allows for “greater sunlight penetration for the amenity space and neighbouring properties.”

The plan also provides more “communal gathering and leisure space,” the application says, including a “vital gathering space and outdoor area for residents, which the (urban design panel) identified as a missing element of the original design.”

The proposal notes that the panel expressed “significant concerns about viability of commercial spaces on the property.” The developer added that the additional parking spots required for retailers and their customers would have created “additional pressure” to use space that can now be devoted to “landscaping and building functions.”

“Ample commercial tenancies are available within walking distance on the north side of Hazeldean Road, offering shops and services to meet daily needs, including a grocery store, fitness club, dry cleaner, physiotherapy clinic, and fast-food outlets,” the document says.

 
As someone who consistently advocates for more development and density, this shouldn't be taller than 6-8 storeys.
 
That is a strange spot for such height, nowhere near existing or planned transit.
 
It would kind of make sense if the old flea market lands and the land across the street from it (Purple) was slated for mid-high rise density, then this one (Green) would be part of a strip of medium/high density...But I have no idea what the plans are for those lands.

This spot has excellent road access to the 7 and 417 and will be close to Stage 3 LRT and it's Park and Rides some day. It's weird if it ends up being alone on that strip, but it's not a bad area for density overall 🤷‍♂️

Screenshot 2024-01-19 170846.png
 
a tower that looks to long for a friend because the rest are so far away lol. honestly it's so random, but it doesn't actually hurt anyone so if they want to do it, whatever lol
 
Why is Ottawa so revolted by height anywhere? 28 floors max in Downtown, 4 floors max in the suburbs. Residents and council have to understand we're an actual city, not Cornwall ++ nor Kingston-lite
 
Why is Ottawa so revolted by height anywhere? 28 floors max in Downtown, 4 floors max in the suburbs. Residents and council have to understand we're an actual city, not Cornwall ++ nor Kingston-lite
This one is 9 and 25 in the suburbs. We're seeing more and more height in the burbs, but usually below 30 floors. Downtown is largely due to the NCC height restrictions, but we are seeing the envelop pushed at LeBreton and all along Line 1 and Line 2 (Dow's Lake to Bayview). I agree though, I'd like to see 40-50 becoming a bit more of a norm along the O-Train.
 
This one is 9 and 25 in the suburbs. We're seeing more and more height in the burbs, but usually below 30 floors. Downtown is largely due to the NCC height restrictions, but we are seeing the envelop pushed at LeBreton and all along Line 1 and Line 2 (Dow's Lake to Bayview). I agree though, I'd like to see 40-50 becoming a bit more of a norm along the O-Train.
I mean, we built the damn line, so we better have developments that maximizes our tax revenues as a consequence. If we don't want Ottawa to eventually go down a fiscal cliff, it's our only option.
 

Back
Top